Interbracket distance differences between different lingual systems

A. Carlucci

Article ID: 6313
Vol 36, Issue 2S4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23812/j.biol.regul.homeost.agents.202236.2S4.17
Received: 9 May 2022; Accepted: 9 May 2022; Available online: 9 May 2022; Issue release: 9 May 2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the interbracket distance in crowdedarches of different lingual appliances.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stereolithographic models of the same patient with 4 differentlingual appliances were used to analyze the interbracket distance. 3Shape software was used to analyzethe interbracket distance for each arch segment and by means of a mathematical formula the forceexpressed by the different appliances in the different arches segments was calculated.RESULTS: Incognito, eBrace and Harmony reported an average interbracket distance of less than 6mm, while STb system showed an average values of 7 mm.CONCLUSION: The interbracket distance, which have an influence on the system stiffness androtational control of the teeth, is significantly greater in STb appliances compared to eBrace, Incognitoand Harmony appliances.


Keywords

crowded arches;brackets;interbracket distan


References

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2022 A. Carlucci




This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).