Thumb basal joint interpositional arthroplasty: a systematic review

M.A. Basso, M. Rizzo, G. Famiglietti, A. Guarino, R.de Giovanni, F. Smeraglia

Article ID: 5581
Vol 34, Issue 5S1, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/jbrha5581
Received: 8 November 2020; Accepted: 8 November 2020; Available online: 8 November 2020; Issue release: 8 November 2020

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the failure rates among different trapeziometacarpal interposition implants used to treat thumb basal joint osteoarthritis. We searched Medline (PubMed), Web of Science and Scopus databases, to identify articles reporting on thumb interpositional arthroplasty, in English literature. We excluded studies with less than 35 cases and with a follow-up shorter than 24 months. Twenty-one studies were included. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Coleman Methodological Score. The mean quality of the studies was moderate. The total number of procedures included in this review was 1205. The failure rate for interposition implants was 11%. The main longterm complication was dislocation, which is also the major reason for revision


Keywords

rizoarthrosis;thumb basal joint;interposition;arthroplasty;replacement


References

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2020 M.A. Basso, M. Rizzo, G. Famiglietti, A. Guarino, R.de Giovanni, F. Smeraglia




This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).