Effects of the sander bite jumping appliance in patients with class ii malocclusion before growth peak

P. Faccioni, D. De Santis, S. Sinigaglia, M. Zarantonello, F. Zotti, P. Pancera, A. Iurlaro, M. Finotti, M. Marchiori, S. Bazzanella, C. Alberti, A. Zangani, G. Capocasale, D. Donadello, F. Faccioni, P.F. Nocini

Article ID: 5551
Vol 34, Issue 6S2, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/jbrha5551
Received: 8 January 2021; Accepted: 8 January 2021; Available online: 8 January 2021; Issue release: 8 January 2021

Abstract

Sander bite jumping appliance (BJA) is a functional appliance used to correct Class II malocclusion in growing patients. The aim of this study was to identify the dento-skeletal effects in patients treated with BJA before growth peak and to compare these effects with the ones obtained in a similar group treated with the Andresen activator (AA). Twenty subjects with class II relationship of the skeletal bases and cervical vertebrae maturation stage 1 or 2 were enrolled in the study and treated with BJA. This group were compared to 14 subjects treated with AA. Cephalometric analyses were carried out using landmarks derived from the analyses of Pancherz, Ricketts, Tweed and Steiner. After treatment with BJA Pg/OLp increase was 7.40±3.81 mm (P<0.001); Pg/OLp+Co/OLp significantly heightened from T0 to T1 (T0: 82.20±4.65 mm vs T1: 89.62±4.27, P<0.001). Overjet (is/OLp - ii/OLp) significantly decreased from T0 to T1 (T0: 7.40±2.31 mm vs T1: 3.05±1.34 mm, P<0.001). Molar relationship improved passing from 1.46±1.68 mm at T0 to -3.56±2.04 mm at T1 (P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between BJA and AA groups at T0 and T1. BJA treatment determined a Class II malocclusion correction in all patients. The correction of molar relationship was mainly due to the increase in mandibular length; the correction of the overjet was due to the increase in mandibular length, to the slight pro-inclination of the lower incisors and the mild retro-inclination of the upper incisors. No significant differences were found in effectiveness between BJA and AA.


Keywords

Class II malocclusion;Sander bite jumping appliance;Andresen activator;Cephalometric analyses


References

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2020 P. Faccioni, D. De Santis, S. Sinigaglia, M. Zarantonello, F. Zotti, P. Pancera, A. Iurlaro, M. Finotti, M. Marchiori, S. Bazzanella, C. Alberti, A. Zangani, G. Capocasale, D. Donadello, F. Faccioni, P.F. Nocini




This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).