Walking the Camino de Santiago: A case study of endurance and wearable technology

Giorjines Boppre

Article ID: 3008
Vol 5, Issue 1, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/wt3008
Received: 18 October 2024; Accepted: 29 November 2024; Available online: 11 December 2024;
Issue release: 30 June 2024

VIEWS - 36 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

This case study examines the use of wearable technology to monitor physiological and performance metrics during a 100+ km pilgrimage on the Camino de Santiago. The subject, a 34-year-old female amateur triathlete recovering from an ankle injury, used a Garmin Enduro device to track key data over five days. The study focuses on heart rate, speed, cadence, caloric expenditure, and environmental factors, shedding light on how wearable devices can provide valuable insights into endurance performance. Correlation analysis highlights significant relationships between physical performance and physiological markers, offering a deeper understanding of how such technology can enhance both athletic performance and the overall pilgrimage experience.


Keywords

Camino de Santiago; endurance walking; wearable technology; pilgrimage


References

1. Amaro S, Antunes A, Henriques C. A closer look at Santiago de Compostela’s pilgrims through the lens of motivations. Tourism Management. 2018; 64: 271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.007

2. Peregrino Od. Información Estadística Oficina Peregrino para 2023 hasta diciembre. Available online: https://oficinadelperegrino.com/en/statistics-2/ (accessed on 29 September 2024).

3. Roszak P, Mróz F. The Camino de Santiago as a ‘Spiritual Journey’: A Contemporary Challenge to Religion? Journal of Religion and Health. 2024; 63(6): 4861–4875. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02108-

4. Felkai P. Medical Problems of Way of St. James Pilgrimage. Journal of Religion and Health. 2019; 58(2): 566–571. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-00744-z

5. Teixeira E, Fonseca H, Diniz-Sousa F, et al. Wearable Devices for Physical Activity and Healthcare Monitoring in Elderly People: A Critical Review. Geriatrics. 2021; 6(2): 38. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020038

6. Ferguson T, Olds T Curtis T, et al. Effectiveness of wearable activity trackers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4(8): e615–e626. doi: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00111-x.

7. Fleiss J. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 2011: 149–185.

8. Ludyga S, Gerber M, Brand S, et al. Acute effects of moderate aerobic exercise on specific aspects of executive function in different age and fitness groups: A meta‐analysis. Psychophysiology. 2016; 53(11): 1611–1626. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12736

9. Maughan RJ, Shirreffs SM, Watson P. Exercise, Heat, Hydration and the Brain. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2007; 26(sup5): 604S–612S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719666

10. Schneider C, Hanakam F, Wiewelhove T, et al. Heart Rate Monitoring in Team Sports—A Conceptual Framework for Contextualizing Heart Rate Measures for Training and Recovery Prescription. Frontiers in Physiology. 2018; 9. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00639

11. Bassett DR. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000; 32(1): 70–84. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012

12. St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004; 38(6): 797–806. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.009852

13. Speakman JR, Selman C. Physical activity and resting metabolic rate. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2003; 62(3): 621–634. doi: 10.1079/pns2003282

14. Hunter GR, Fisher G, Neumeier WH, et al. Exercise Training and Energy Expenditure following Weight Loss. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2015; 47(9): 1950–1957. doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000622

15. Cheung SS, McLellan TM, Tenaglia S. The Thermophysiology of Uncompensable Heat Stress. Sports Medicine. 2000; 29(5): 329–359. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029050-00004

16. Cuddy JS, Hailes WS, Ruby BC. A reduced core to skin temperature gradient, not a critical core temperature, affects aerobic capacity in the heat. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2014; 43: 7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.04.002

17. Ely MR, Cheuvront SN, Roberts WO, et al. Impact of Weather on Marathon-Running Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2007; 39(3): 487–493. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802d3aba

18. Sawka MN, Burke LM, Eichner ER, Maughan RJ, Montain SJ, Stachenfeld NS. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Feb 2007;39(2):377-90. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31802ca597.

19. Baldwin JW, Benmarhnia T, Ebi KL, et al. Humidity’s Role in Heat-Related Health Outcomes: A Heated Debate. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2023; 131(5): 55001. doi: 10.1289/ehp11807

20. Seiler S. What is Best Practice for Training Intensity and Duration Distribution in Endurance Athletes? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2010; 5(3): 276–291. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.3.276

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Giorjines Boppre

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/