This paper delves deeply into the innovative realm of integrating human emotions with wearable technology. The primary focus is on the conceptualization and development of a kiss transfer device that harnesses the power of wearable technology to bridge the physical gap in human-human interactions. By investigating the intricate nuances of the human-human kissing process, the research seeks to replicate this intimate gesture through a technological medium. The paper not only elaborates on the anatomy, evolution, and hormonal dynamics of kissing but also underscores the transformative potential of wearable technology in capturing and transmitting these intimate moments. This exploration opens up new horizons for long-distance relationships, offering a tangible touchpoint that goes beyond traditional communication methods. Through this pioneering work, the research positions wearable technology as not just a tool for communication but as an extension of our human emotions and expressions.
Digisonic® SP cochlear implant evaluation: Patient evolution and titanium screw fixation system
Vol 3, Issue 2, 2022
VIEWS - 1958 (Abstract)
Download PDF
Abstract
11111
Keywords
References
1. Yang W, Moon IS, Kim HN, et al. Delayed cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual se-vere-to-profound hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32(2): 223–228.
2. Budenz CL, Cosetti MK, Coelho DH, et al. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech percep-tion in older adults. Journal of the American Geri-atrics Society 2011; 59(3): 446–453.
3. Klop WM, Briaire JJ, Stiggelbout AM, et al. Coch-lear implant outcomes and quality of life in adults with prelingual deafness. Laryngoscope 2007; 117(11): 1982–1987.
4. Chung J, Chueng K, Shipp D, et al. Unilateral mul-ti-channel cochlear implantation results in signifi-cant improvement in quality of life. Otology & Neurotology 2012; 33(4): 566–571.
5. Brito R, Monteiro TA, Leal AF, et al. Surgical com-plications in 550 consecutive cochlear implanta-tions. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2012; 78(3): 80–85.
6. Yun J, Colburn MW, Antonelli PJ. Cochlear implant magnet displacement with minor head trauma. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2005; 133(2): 275–277.
7. Hoffman RA, Cohen NL. Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 1995; 166: 420–422.
8. Migirov L, Muchnik C, Kaplan-Neeman R, et al. Surgical and medical complications in pediatric cochlear implantation: a review of 300 cases. Cochlear Implants International 2006; 7(4): 194–201.
9. Mann WJ, Gosepath J. Technical note: minimal access surgery for cochlear implantation with MED-EL devices. ENT J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006; 68(5): 270–272.
10. Loh C, Jiang D, Dezso A, et al. Non-sutured fixation of cochlear implants using a minimally-invasive approach. Clinical Otolaryngology 2008; 33(3): 259–261.
11. Carvalho GM, Valente JPP, Duarte ASM, et al. Electro acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Unicamp’s surgical approach. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2012; 78(1): 43–50.
12. James AL, Papsin BC. Device fixation and small incision access for pediatric cochlear implants. In-ternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol-ogy. 2004; 68(8): 1017–1022.
13. Dalchow CV, Werner JA. A new instrument for minimal access surgery in cochlear implantation. Otology & Neurotology 2005; 26(4): 678–679.
14. Lee DJ, Driver M. Cochlear implant fixation using titanium screws. Laryngoscope 2005; 115(5): 910–911.
15. Davis BM, Labadie RF, McMenomey SO, et al. Cochlear implant fixation using polypropylene mesh and titanium screws. Laryngoscope 2004; 114(12): 2116–2118.
16. Otto RA, Lane AP, Carrasco VN. A new technique for securing cochlear implants. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1999; 120(6): 897–898.
17. Guevara N, Sterkers O, Bébéar JP, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the Digisonic SP cochlear implant fixation system with titanium screws in 156 patients. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 2010; 119(8): 501–505.
18. Vincent C, Ruzza I, Vaneecloo FM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008; 265(9): 1043–1046.
19. McCormick B, Archbold S (editors). Cochlear im-plants for young children: the Nottingham approach to assessment and rehabilitation. 2nd ed. London: Whurr; 2003. p.162–215.
20. Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, et al. Correla-tion between electrical auditory brainstem response and perceptual thresholds in digisonic cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope.1998; 108(4 Pt 1): 554-559.
21. Prager JD, Neidich MJ, Perkins JN, et al. Minimal access and standard cochlear implantation: A comparative study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 2012; 76(8): 1102–1106.
22. Nadège C, Valérie G, Laura F, et al. The cost of cochlear implantation: a review of methodological considerations. Int J Otolaryngol. 2011; 2011: 210838.
23. Turchetti G, Bellelli S, Palla I, et al. Systematic re-view of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in adult patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2011; 31(5): 319-327.
24. Turchetti G, Bellelli S, Palla I, et al. Systematic re-view of the scientific literature on the economic evaluation of cochlear implants in paediatric pa-tients. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2011; 31(5): 311-318.
25. Peñaranda A, Mendieta JC, Perdomo JA, et al. Economic benefits of the cochlear implant for treating profound sensorineural hearing loss. Re-vista Panamericana de Salud Publica-Pan American Journal of Public Health 2012; 31(4): 325-331.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Guilherme Machado de Carvalho, Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães, Fabiana Danieli, Lúcia Cristina Beltrame Onuki, Jorge Rizzato Paschoal, Walter Adriano Bianchini, Arthur Menino Castilho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Prof. Zhen Cao
College of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University
China, China
Processing Speed
-
-
-
- ＜5 days from submission to initial review decision;
- 62% acceptance rate
-
-
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.