A comparison between the efficacy of methylphenidate and cocaine for nasal vasoconstriction before nasal surgery—A randomized prospective study

Ramaiyan Velmurugan, J. Dhanush

Article ID: 2114
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023

VIEWS - 114 (Abstract)

Abstract

Objectives: Cocaine is regularly utilized topically to give the vasoconstriction to nasal medical procedure; However, it is said to create intraoperative cardiovascular unfriendly impacts. Methylphenidate was considered in the place of cocaine as a substitute to look at the vasoconstriction in nasal medical procedure. Methods: Outcome of the study will be examining the vasoconstriction based on a 5-point scale (1 = unacceptable, 5 = excellent), followed by the administration of either 20–30 mg per day methylphenidate or 4% cocaine randomly to the adult patients subjected to nasal septoplasty. Results: Methylphenidate and cocaine were administered with 38 and 28 patients respectively. The quality of vasoconstriction was noticed to be good in both the groups with the median rating of 4.0 and a P value of 0.85. With both the gatherings, the median blood loss was 46 and 58 ml with a p estimation of 0.48. A non-mediocrity delta of 1 point with a p estimation of 0.009 and non-inadequacy delta of 24 ml with a p esteem 0.026 concerning vasoconstriction and blood loss individually is seen which demonstrates methylphenidate is comparable to cocaine. Non importance is noted with the recurrence of ventricular ectopy, ST section changes after nasal packing with the gatherings. Conclusions: With the results obtained, methylphenidate can be very well replaced for cocaine for vasoconstriction in septoplasty. As there are lot many underlying chances for cocaine abuse and administrative issues related to its handling, methylphenidate may serve as a substitute.


Keywords

cocaine; vasoconstriction; local anaesthetics; nasal medical procedure; methylphenidate

Full Text:

PDF



References

1. Feldman MA, Patel A. Anesthesia for eye, ear, nose, and throat surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 2357–2388.

2. Liao B, Hilsinger RL, Rasgon BM, et al. A preliminary study of cocaine absorption from the nasal mucosa. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 98–102.

3. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 321: 1557–1562.

4. El-Din AS, Mostafa SM. Severe hypertension during anaesthesia for dacryocystorhinostomy. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 787–789.

5. Meyers EF. Cocaine toxicity during dacryocystor-hinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98: 842–843.

6. Albers FW. The clinical use of cocaine in rhinosurgery: A case-report and a review. Rhinology 1990; 28: 55–59.

7. Minor RL, Scott BD, Brown DD, et al. Cocaine-induced myocardial infarction in patients with normal coronary arteries. Annals of Internal Medicine 1991; 115: 797–806.

8. Gotta AW, Ferrari LR. Anesthesia for otolaryngologic surgery. Philadelpahia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2009. p. 1305–1320.

9. Sessler CN, Vitaliti JC, Cooper KR, et al. Comparison of 4% lidocaine 0.5% phenylephrine with 5% cocaine: Which dilates the nasal passage better? Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 274–277.

10. Gross JB, Hartigan ML, Schaffer DW. A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine-0.25% phenylephrine nasal spray. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1984; 63: 915–918.

11. Groudine SB, Hollinger I, Jones J, et al. New York State guidelines on the topical use of phenylephrine in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 859–864.

12. Torres M, Rocha S, Rebelo A, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of cocaine of iatrogenic origin. Case report. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 2007; 26: 1395–1404.

13. Greinwald JH, Holtel MR. Absorption of topical cocaine in rhinologic procedures. Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1223–1225.

14. Makaryus JN, Makaryus AN, Johnson M. Acute myocardial infarction following the use of intranasal anesthetic cocaine. Southern Medical Journal 2006; 99: 759–761.

15. Smith JC, Rockley TJ. A comparison of cocaine andcophenylcaine local anaesthesia in flexible nasendoscopy. Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences 2002; 27: 192–196.

16. Drivas EI, Hajiioannou JK, Lachanas VA, et al. Cocaine versus tetracaine in septoplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 2007; 121: 130–133.

17. McCluney NA, Eng CY, Lee MS, et al. A comparison of xylometazoline (Otrivine) and phenylephrine/lignocaine mixture (Cophenylcaine) for the purposes of rigid nasendoscopy: A prospective, double-blind, randomised trial. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 2009; 123: 626–630.

18. Riegle EV, Gunter JB, Lusk RP, et al. Comparison of vasoconstrictors for functional endoscopic sinus surgery in children. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 820–823.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/ccr.v4i2.2114
(114 Abstract Views, 0 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.