Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
A review on phenomenon of adsorption of inorganic materials: Applications in veterinary pharmacology and material sciences
Vol 5, Issue 2, 2024
Issue release: 31 December 2024
VIEWS - 160 (Abstract) 88 (PDF)
Download PDF
Abstract
The inorganic compound water is the second most essential component after air for perpetuation of life on the planet. Due to human activity the natural resources of water are highly contaminated. The water reservoir contains physical, chemical and biological impurities. Sometimes radioactive materials are discharged in the reservoir creating even hazardous effects. The presence of heavy metal ions in drinkable water is a major global challenge for mankind. The heavy inorganic materials can be separated using various techniques. With the advancement in modern science, nanomaterials are found to be effective in removal of heavy inorganic materials from water. As surface area at nanoscale increases, the possibility of adsorption also gets increased. Therefore, nanomaterials are being effectively used in water purification techniques. In this review, we will focus on how heavy metals with negative environmental consequences may be removed using an adsorption approach that involves iron oxide nanoparticles, which has been shown to be effective in this field. We are going to discuss several methods along with current advancements in iron oxide nanoparticles for heavy metal ion adsorption from water. The discussion covers candidate synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles, mechanisms that enable the applications, advantages, and limitations as compared to existing processes and their adsorption mechanism. Apart from this we have focused the application of adsorption particularly in veterinary science and animal husbandry. The phenomenon of adsorption is of paramount importance in veterinary pharmacology as well.
Keywords
References
1. WPNWAC. Water Pollution, National Water Awareness Campaign, Gaia Atlas of Planet Man-agement, the Guardian. WPNWAC; 2003.
2. Carneiro PA, Umbuzeiro GA, Oliveira DP, et al. Assessment of water contamination caused by a mutagenic textile effluent/dyehouse effluent bearing disperse dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009; 174(2010): 694–699.
3. Afkhami A, Moosavi R. Adsorptive removal of Congo red, a carcinogenic textile dye, from aqueous solutions by maghemite nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009; 174(1–3): 398–403.
4. Badruddoza AZM, Shawon ZBZ, Day WJ, et al. Fe3O4/cyclodextrin polymer nanocomposites for selective heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013; 91(1): 322–332.
5. Rafatullah M, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, et al. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010; 177(1–3): 70–80.
6. Iram M, Guo C, Guan Y, et al. Adsorption and magnetic removal of neutral red dye from aqueous solution using Fe3O4 hollow nanospheres. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010; 181(1–3): 1039–1050.
7. Akinci A, Guven DE, Ugurlu SK. Assessing pollution in Izmir Bay from rivers in western Turkey: Heavy metals. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 2013; 15: 2252–2262.
8. Al-Musharafi SK, Mahmoud IY, Al-Bahry SN. Heavy Metal Pollution from Treated Sewage Effluent. APCBEE Procedia. 2013; 5: 344–348.
9. Naser HA. Assessment and management of heavy metal pollution in the marine environment of the Arabian Gulf: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013; 72(1): 6–13.
10. Fujita M, Ide Y, Sato D, et al. Heavy metal contamination of coastal lagoon sediments: Fongafale Islet, Funafuti Atoll, Tuvalu. Chemosphere. 2016; 95: 628–634.
11. Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, et al. The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2011; 409: 3555–3563.
12. Ahmed MA, Ali SM, El-Dek SI, et al. Magnetite-hematite nanoparticles prepared by green methods for heavy metal ions removal from water. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2013; 178: 744–751.
13. Badruddoza AZM, Shawon ZBZ, Rahman MT, et al. Ionically modified magnetic nanomaterials for arsenic and chromium removal from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 225: 607–615.
14. Zou YD, Cao XH, Luo XP, et al. Recycle of U(VI) from aqueous solution by situ phosphorylation mesoporous carbon. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015; 306: 515–525.
15. Sun Y, Wu ZY, Wang X, et al. Macroscopic and Microscopic Investigation of U(VI) and Eu(Ⅲ) Adsorption on Carbonaceous Nanofibers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016; 50: 4459–4467.
16. Lei Y, Guan JJ, Chen W, et al. Fabrication of hydroxyapatite/chitosan porous materials for Pb(ii) removal from aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 25462–25470.
17. Pang Y, Zeng G, Tang L, Y, et al. PEI-grafted magnetic porous powder for highly effective adsorption of heavy metal ions. Desalination. 2011; 281: 278–284.
18. Yang G, Tang L, Lei XG, et al. Cd(Ⅱ) removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on α-ketoglutaric acid-modified magnetic chitosan. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014; 292: 710–716.
19. Ren Y, Li N, Feng J, et al. Adsorption of Pb(Ⅱ) and Cu(Ⅱ) from aqueous solution on magnetic porous ferrospinel MnFe2O4. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012; 367: 415–421.
20. Mageshwari K, Mali SS, Sathyamoorthy R, et al. Template-free synthesis of MgO nanoparticles for effective photocatalytic applications. Powder Technol. 2013; 249: 456–462.
21. Xu SC, Zhang YX, Pan SS, et al. Recyclable magnetic photocatalysts of Fe2+/TiO2 hierarchical architecture with effective removal of Cr(Ⅵ) under UV light from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011; 196: 29–35.
22. Yu L, Peng X, Ni F, et al. Arsenite removal from aqueous solutions by γ-Fe2O3–TiO2 magnetic nanoparticles through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013; 246–247: 10–17.
23. Waifalkar PP, Parit SB, Chougale AD, et al. Immobilization of invertase on chitosan coated γ-Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles to facilitate magnetic separation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016; 482: 159–164.
24. Chong NM, Jin B, Chow CWK, et al. Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review. Water Res. 2010; 44: 2997–3027.
25. Mandel K, Hutter F, Gellermann C, et al. Modified Superparamagnetic Nanocomposite Microparticles for Highly Selective HgII or CuII Separation and Recovery from Aqueous Solutions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012; 4: 5633–5642.
26. Chong MF. Direct Flocculation Process for Wastewater Treatment. Adv. Water Treat. Pollut. Prev. 2012; 201–230.
27. Rubio J, Zaneti RN. Treatment of washrack wastewater with water recycling by advanced flocculation–column flotation. Desalin. Water Treat. 2009; 8: 146–153.
28. Shin GA, Sobsey MD. Removal of norovirus from water by coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation processes. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply. 2015; 15: 158.
29. Gadekar MR, Ahammed MM. Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using water treatment residuals: Modelling through artificial neural networks. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016; 57: 26392–26400.
30. Al-Shammari AA, Rahman SU, Chin DT. An oblique rotating barrel electrochemical reactor for removal of copper ions from wastewater. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2004; 34: 447–453.
31. Rezaee A, Hossini H, Masoumbeigi H, et al. Simultaneous Removal of Hexavalent Chromium and Nitrate from Wastewater using Electrocoagulation Method. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 2011; 294–298.
32. da Silva LF, Barbosa AD, de Paula HM, et al. Treatment of paint manufacturing wastewater by coagulation/electrochemical methods: Proposals for disposal and/or reuse of treated water. Water Res. 2016; 101: 467–475.
33. Pekey H. Eluation of electrochemical peroxidation (ECP) process variables for removal of co-complex dye using a central composite design. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015; 57: 9845–9858
34. Bocos E, Oturan N, Sanromán MA, et al. Elimination of radiocontrast agent Diatrizoic acid from water by electrochemical advanced oxidation: Kinetics study, mechanism and mineralization pathway. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016; 772: 1–8.
35. Dipu S, Kumar AA, Thanga SG. Effect of chelating agents in phytoremediation of heavy metals. Remediat. J. 2012; 22: 133–146.
36. Banerjee A, Ghoshal AK. Bioremediation of petroleum wastewater by hyper-phenol tolerant Bacillus cereus: Preliminary studies with laboratory-scale batch process. Bioengineered. 2017; 1–5.
37. Sharma S, Malaviya P. Bioremediation of tannery wastewater by chromium resistant novel fungal consortium. Ecol. Eng. 2016; 91: 419–425.
38. Pang Y, Zeng GM, Tang L, et al. Cr(Ⅵ) reduction by Pseudomonas aeruginosa immobilized in a polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate matrix containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102: 10733–10736.
39. Zhang M, Gao B, Varnoosfaderani S, et al. Inyang, Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetic biochar for arsenic removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2013; 130: 457–462.
40. Azarudeen RS, Subha R, Jeyakumar D, et al. Batch separation studies for the removal of heavy metal ions using a chelating terpolymer: Synthesis, characterization and isotherm models. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013; 116: 366–377.
41. Wawrzkiewicz M. Anion Exchange Resins as Effective Sorbents for Acidic Dye Removal from Aqueous Solutions and Wastewaters. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2012; 30: 507–523.
42. Naushad M, Khan MR, ALOthman AZ, et al. Bromate removal from water samples using strongly basic anion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015; 57: 5781–5788.
43. Rezvani-Boroujeni A, Javanbakht M, Karimi MC, et al. Immoblization of Thiol-Functionalized Nanosilica on the Surface of Poly (ether sulfone) Membranes for the Removal of Heavy-Metal Ions from Industrial Wastewater Samples. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015; 54: 502–513.
44. Alothman ZA, Unsal YE, Habila M, et al. A membrane filtration procedure for the enrichment, separation, and flame atomic absorption spectrometric determinations of some metals in water, hair, urine, and fish samples. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016; 53: 3457–3465.
45. San Román MF, Gándara IO, Ibañez R, et al. Hybrid membrane process for the recovery of major components (zinc, iron and HCl) from spent pickling effluents. J. M emb. Sci. 2012; 415–416: 616–623.
46. Falaki F, Berijani S. Aspartic acid-modified magnetic nanoparticles as an ideal sorbent for solid phase extraction of Pb in water samples prior to ICP-OES determination. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016; 57: 25765–25772.
47. Joo SH, Tansel B. Novel technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment: A review. J. Environ. Manage. 2015; 150: 322–335.
48. Shaffer DL, Yip NY, Gilron J, et al. Seawater desalination for agriculture by integrated forward and reverse osmosis: Improved product water quality for potentially less energy. J. Memb. Sci. 2012; 415–416: 1–8.
49. Feng Z, Zhu S, de Godoi DRM, et al. Adsorption of Cd2+ on Carboxyl-Terminated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2012; 84: 3764–3770.
50. Kharisov BI, Dias RHV, Kharissova OV, et al. Iron-containing nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, and environmental applications. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 9325.
51. Shuang C, Li P, Li A, et al. Quaternized magnetic microspheres for the efficient removal of reactive dyes. Water Res. 2012; 46: 4417–4426.
52. Saiz J, Bringas E, Ortiz I. Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles as new adsorption materials for arsenic removal from polluted waters. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014; 89: 909–918.
53. Keyhanian F, Shariati S, Faraji M, et al. Magnetite nanoparticles with surface modification for removal of methyl violet from aqueous solutions. Arab. J. Chem. 2016; 9: S348–S354.
54. Auffan M, Rose J, Proux O, et al. Enhanced Adsorption of Arsenic onto Maghemites Nanoparticles: As(Ⅲ) as a Probe of the Surface Structure and Heterogeneity. Langmuir. 2008; 24: 3215–3222.
55. Qu, X, Alvarez PJJ, Li O. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2013; 47: 3931–3946.
56. Kyzas GZ, Matis KA. Nanoadsorbents for pollutants removal: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2015; 203: 159–168.
57. Lingamdinne LP, Koduru JR, Roh H, et al. Adsorption removal of Co(Ⅱ) from waste-water using graphene oxide. Hydrometallurgy. 2016; 165: 90–96.
58. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Goudarzi A, et al. Mehdizadeh Langroodi, Magnetic nanoparticle based dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction for the determination of malachite green in water samples: Optimized experimental design. New J. Chem. 2015; 39: 9813–9823.
59. Wang S, Sun H, Ang HM, et al. Adsorptive remediation of environmental pollutants using novel graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 226: 336–347.
60. Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P, Ok YS. Review on nano zerovalent iron (nZVI): From synthesis to environmental applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2016; 287: 618–632.
61. Ali I. New Generation Adsorbents for Water Treatment. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 5073–5091.
62. Xu P, Zeng GM, Huang DL, et al. Science of the Total Environment Use of iron oxide nanomaterials in wastewater treatment: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2012; 424: 1–10.
63. Warner CL, Chouyyok W, Mackie KE, et al. Manganese Doping of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Tailoring Surface Reactivity for a Regenerable Heavy Metal Sorbent. Langmuir. 2012; 28: 3931–3937.
64. Karatapanis AE, Petrakis DE, Stalikas CD. A layered magnetic iron/iron oxide nanoscavenger for the analytical enrichment of ng-L-1 concentration levels of heavy metals from water. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2012; 726: 22–27
65. Yang H, Tian Z, Wang J, et al. A magnetic resonance imaging nanosensor for Hg (II) based on thymidine-functionalized supermagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2012; 161: 429–433.
66. Gupta VK, Tyagi I, Sadegh H, et al. Nanoparticles as Adsorbent: A Positive Approach for Removal of Noxious Metal Ions: A Review. Science Technology and Development. 2015; 34(3): 195–214.
67. Yilmaz E, Alosmanov RM, Soylak M. Magnetic solid phase extraction of lead(ii) and cadmium(ii) on a magnetic phosphorus-containing polymer (M-PhCP) for their microsampling flame atomic absorption spectrometric determinations. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 33801–33808.
68. Liu Z, Wang H, Liu C, et al. Magnetic cellulose–chitosan hydrogels prepared from ionic liquids as reusable adsorbent for removal of heavy metal ions. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 7350.
69. Khan M, Yilmaz E, Sevinc B, et al. Preparation and characterization of magnetic allylamine modified graphene oxide-poly (vinyl acetate-co-divinylbenzene) nanocomposite for vortex assisted magnetic solid phase extraction of some metal ions. Talanta. 2016; 146: 130–137.
70. Chen L, Wang T, Tong J. Application of derivatized magnetic materials to the separation and the preconcentration of pollutants in water samples. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2011; 30: 1095–1108.
71. Prasad RD, Charmode N, Shrivastav OP, et al. A Review on Concept of Nanotechnology in Veterinary Medicine. ES Food Agrofor. 2021; 28–60.
72. Cornell RM, Schwertmann U. The Iron Oxides. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2003.
73. Cornelissen G, Van Noort PCM, Parsons JR, et al. Temperature dependence of slow adsorption and desorption kinetics of organic compounds in sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997; 31: 454–460.
74. Giles CH, Smith D, Huitson A. A General Treatment and Classification of the Solute Adsorption Isotherm. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1974; 47: 755–765.
75. Limousin G, Gaudet PJ, Charlet L, et al. Sorption isotherms: A review on physical bases, modeling and measurement. Appl. Geochemistry. 2007; 22: 249–275.
76. Bhavsar K, Labhane PK, Dhake RB, et al. Solvothermal synthesis of activated carbon loaded CdS nanoflowers: Boosted photodegradation of dye by adsorption and photocatalysis synergy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020; 744: 137202.
77. Sadav SK, Singh DK, Sinha S. Chemical carbonization of papaya seed originated charcoals for sorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014; 2(1) 9–19.
78. Sonawane GH, Patil SP, Shrivastava VS. Photocatalytic Degradation of Safranine by ZnO–Bentonite: Photodegradation versus Adsorbability. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. E. 2017; 98: 55–63.
79. Amin N, Hussain A, Alamzeb S, et al. Accumulation of heavy metals in edible parts of vegetables irrigated with waste water and their daily intake to adults and children, District Mardan, Pakistan. Food Chem. 2013; 136: 1515–1523.
80. Wu X, Liang Y, Jin T, et al. Renal effects evolution in a Chinese population after reduction of cadmium exposure in rice. Environ. Res. 2008; 108: 233–238.
81. Waalkes MP. Cadmium carcinogenesis in review. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2000; 79: 241–244.
82. Inaba T, Kobayashi E, Suwazono Y, et al. Estimation of cumulative cadmium intake causing Itai–itai disease. Toxicol. Lett. 2015; 159: 192–201.
83. Järup L, Åkesson A. Current status of cadmium as an environmental health problem. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009; 238: 201–208.
84. Mbarek S, Saidi T, Mansour HB, et al. Effect of cadmium on water metabolism regulation by Meriones shawi (Rodentia, Muridae). Environm. Eng. Sci. 2011; 28.
85. Ghasemi E, Heydari A, Sillanpää M. Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@EDTA nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for simultaneous removal of Ag(I), Hg(Ⅱ), Mn(Ⅱ), Zn(Ⅱ), Pb(Ⅱ) and Cd(Ⅱ) from water and soil environmental samples. Microchem. J. 2017; 131: 51–56.
86. Karami H. Heavy metal removal from water by magnetite nanorods. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 219: 209–216.
87. Chen K, He J, Li Y, et al. Removal of cadmium and lead ions from water by sulfonated magnetic nanoparticle adsorbents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017; 494: 307–316.
88. Zhu X, Song T, Lv Z, et al. High-efficiency and low-cost α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles-coated volcanic rock for Cd(Ⅱ) removal from wastewater. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2016; 104: 373–381.
89. Ehrampoush MH, Miria M, Salmani MH, et al. Cadmium removal from aqueous solution by green synthesis iron oxide nanoparticles with tangerine peel extract. J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng. 2015; 13: 1–7.
90. Markeb AA, Ordosgoitia LA, Alonso A, et al. Novel magnetic core–shell Ce–Ti@Fe3O4 nanoparticles as an adsorbent for water contaminants removal. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 56913–56917.
91. Fu F, Cheng Z, Dionysiou DD, et al. Fe/Al bimetallic particles for the fast and highly efficient removal of Cr(Ⅵ) over a wide pH range: Performance and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015; 298: 261–269.
92. Petala E, Dimos K, Douvalis A, et al. Nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on mesoporous silica: Characterization and reactivity for Cr(Ⅵ) removal from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013; 261: 295–306.
93. Léonard A, Lauwerys RR. Carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chromium. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. 1980; 76: 227–239
94. Abbasi SA, Soni R. Teratogenic effects of chromium (vi) in environment as evidenced by the impact on larvae of amphibian Rana Tigrina: Implications in the environmental management of chromium. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 1984; 23: 131–137.
95. Sheehan PJ, Meyer DM, Sauer MM, Paustenbach DJ. Assessment of the human health risks posed by exposure to chromium‐contaminated soils. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1991; 32: 161–201.
96. Lei Y, Chen F, Luo Y, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic graphene oxide foam/Fe3O4 nanocomposite as an efficient absorbent for Cr(Ⅵ) removal. J. Mater. Sci. 2014; 49: 4236–4245.
97. Lingamdinne LP, Chang Y, Yang JK, et al. Biogenic reductive preparation of magnetic inverse spinel iron oxide nanoparticles for the adsorption removal of heavy metals. Chem. Eng. J. 2017; 307: 74–84.
98. Xiao Z, Zhang H, Xu Y, et al. Ultra-efficient removal of chromium from aqueous medium by biogenic iron based nanoparticles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017; 174: 466–473.
99. Zhou X, Jing G, Lv BZ, et al. Highly efficient removal of Chromium(Ⅵ) by Fe/Ni bimetallic nanoparticles in an ultrasound-assisted system. Chemosphere. 2016; 160: 332–341.
100. Wei Y, Fang Z, Zheng L, et al. Biosynthesized iron nanoparticles in aqueous extracts of Eichhornia crassipes and its mechanism in the hexavalent chromium removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017; 399: 322–329.
101. Li CJ, Li YJ, Wang JN, et al. PA6@FexOy nanofibrous membrane preparation and its strong Cr(Ⅵ)-removal performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 220: 294–301.
102. Hsiao HW, Ullrich SM, Tanton TW. Burdens of mercury in residents of Temirtau, Kazakhstan. Sci. Total Environ. 2011; 409: 2272–2280.
103. Yau VM, Green PG, Alaimo CP, et al. Erratum to prenatal and neonatal peripheral blood mercury levels and autism spectrum disorders. Environ. Res. 2014; 133: 294–303.
104. Loux NT. An assessment of mercury-species-dependent binding with natural organic carbon. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 1998; 10: 127–136.
105. Faulconer KE, von Reitzenstein NVH, Mazyck DW. Optimization of magnetic powdered activated carbon for aqueous Hg(II) removal and magnetic recovery. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012; 199–200: 9–14.
106. Liu M, Tao Z, Wang H, et al. Study on the adsorption of Hg(ii) by one-pot synthesis of amino-functionalized graphene oxide decorated with a Fe3O4 microsphere nanocomposite. RSC Adv. 2016; 6: 84573–84586.
107. Diagboya PN, Olu-Owolabi BI, Adebowale KO. Synthesis of covalently bonded graphene oxide–iron magnetic nanoparticles and the kinetics of mercury removal. RSC Adv. 2015; 5: 2536–2542.
108. Azari A, Gharibi H, Kakavandi BG, et al. Magnetic adsorption separation process: An alternative method of mercury extracting from aqueous solution using modified chitosan coated Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2016; 92: 188–200.
109. Zhang S, Zhang Y, Liu J, et al. Thiol modified Fe3O4@SiO2 as a robust, high effective, and recycling magnetic sorbent for mercury removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 226: 30–38.
110. Elhouderi ZA, Beesley DP, Nguyen TT, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and application of Fe3O4/Ag magnetic composites for mercury removal from water. Mater. Res. Express. 2016; 3: 45013.
111. Oveisi F, Nikazar M, Razzaghi MH, et al. Effective removal of mercury from aqueous solution using thiol-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Environ. Nanotechnology, Monit. Manag. 2017; 7: 130–138.
112. Özlem Z, Kocabaş-Ataklı, Yürüm Y. Synthesis and characterization of anatase nanoadsorbent and application in removal of lead, copper and arsenic from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2013; 225: 625–635.
113. Li YH, Di Z, Ding J, et al. Adsorption thermodynamic, kinetic and desorption studies of Pb2+ on carbon nanotubes. Water Res. 2005; 39: 605–609.
114. Zhang B, Lu L, Hu Q, et al. ZnO nanoflower-based photoelectrochemical DNAzyme sensor for the detection of Pb2+. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014; 56: 243–249.
115. Xiang B, Ling D, Lou H, et al. 3D hierarchical flower-like nickel ferrite/manganese dioxide toward lead(Ⅱ) removal from aqueous water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016; 325: 178–188.
116. Shipley HJ, Engates KE, Grover VA. Removal of Pb(Ⅱ), Cd(Ⅱ), Cu(Ⅱ), and Zn(Ⅱ) by hematite nanoparticles: Effect of sorbent concentration, pH, temperature, and exhaustion. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012; 20: 1727–1736.
117. Mahdavi S, Jalali M, Afkhami A. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2012; 14.
118. Wang J, Guo X. Rethinking of the intraparticle diffusion adsorption kinetics model: Interpretation, solving methods and applications. Chemosphere. 2022; 309 (2): 136732.
119. Kolle JM, Fayaz M, Sayari A. Understanding the effect of water on CO2 adsorption. Chemical Reviews. 2021; 121(13): 7280-7345.
120. Zhang J, Yang HB, Zhou D, et al. Adsorption energy in oxygen electrocatalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2022; 122(23): 17028–17072.
121. Dotto EC, Lima LFO, Luizet G, et al. Adsorption: Fundamental aspects and applications of adsorption for effluent treatment, Green technologies for the defluoridation of water. Elsevier. 2021. 41–88.
122. Kalam S, Abu-Khamsin S, Shahzad Kamal M, et al. Surfactant adsorption isotherms: A review. ACS omega. 2021; 6(48): 32342–32348.
123. Patil PD, Mohite VS, Virani KS, et al. Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions from Water Using Iron oxide Nanodsorbent: A Review of Recent Literature, J.of Shivaji University, Science and Technology. 2023; 44(1): 9–24.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rai Dhirendra Prasad, Neeraj R. Prasad, Nirmala Prasad, Rai Surrender Prasad, Saurabh R. Prasad, Om Prakash Shrivastav, Rai Bishvendra Prasad, Rai Akhilendra Prasad, Rai Girindra Prasad, Piyush Saxena
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
1.jpg)
Prof. Sivanesan Subramanian
Anna University, India
Prof. Pascal Lorenz
University of Haute Alsace, France
Dortmund University of Technology, Germany.
Interests: Mass spectrometry, Molecular Structural Analysis, Methodology; Application; Biological, Environmental and Food samples.
