Comparative study on the determination of free formaldehyde residue in vaccines by pre-column derivative liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization liquid chromatography

Yukun Chen, Congcong Liu, Weiyang Liang

Article ID: 2009
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54517/aas.v4i2.2009
Received: 02 September 2023; Accepted: 26 September 2023; Available online: 09 December 2023;
Issue release: 31 December 2023

VIEWS - 3508 (Abstract)

Download PDF

Abstract

Objective: To develop and compare methods for quantifying residual free formaldehyde in vaccines using pre-column and post-column derivatization liquid chromatography, and to assess the consistency between these methods. Methods: For pre-column derivatization, we used a Shimadzu LC-20AT liquid chromatograph equipped with an SPD-20A UV detector. Separation was achieved with a mobile phase consisting of 60% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0. 8 mL·min−1 and a column temperature of 40 ℃. Detection was performed at 360 nm using a Kromasil 100-5-C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column. For post-column derivatization, we employed a Shimadzu LC-20AT liquid chromatograph with an SPD-M20A diode array detector and a vector derivative device. Separation was conducted with a mobile phase of 0.2% (V/V) phosphoric acid at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1 and a column temperature of 25 ℃. Detection was carried out at 412 nm using a Chrom Core AQ-C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column. The derivatization solution was acetate buffer, flowing at 0.5 mL·min−1 and maintained at 100 ℃. Both methods were evaluated for precision, repeatability, and sample recovery, with statistical significance assessed using F-test and t-test. Results: The pre-column derivatization method exhibited linearity over the range of 0.025–100 μg·mL−1 (R = 0.9999, n = 12). Precision showed an RSD value of 0.06%, and repeatability ranged from 0.3% to 1.4%. Average recoveries were between 97.3% and 104.8%, with RSD values from 0.7% to 2.9%. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.02 μg·mL−1, and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.01 μg·mL−1. The post-column derivatization method demonstrated linearity in the same range (0.025–100 μg·mL−1, R = 0.9999, n = 12). Precision showed an RSD value of 0.02%, and repeatability ranged from 0.7% to 3.5%. Average recoveries were between 105.6% and 114.6%, with RSD values from 0.3% to 1.9%. The LOQ was 0.02 μg·mL−1, and the LOD was 0.006 μg·mL−1. Statistical analysis indicated that both methods produced comparable results. Conclusion: Both pre-column and post-column derivatization liquid chromatography methods are simple, accurate, and highly sensitive, making them suitable for determining residual free formaldehyde in vaccines.


Keywords

vaccine; free formaldehyde; pre-column derivatization liquid chromatography; post-column derivatization liquid chromatographyy


References

1.

1.         Li JY, Zhang JY, Yang XM. Progress in research on commonly used inactivators of biological products. Chin J Biol. 2018; 31(9): 1040.

2.

2.         Michiels TJM, Schöneich C, Hamzink MRJ, et al. Novel Formaldehyde-Induced Modifications of Lysine Residue Pairs in Peptides and Proteins: Identification and Relevance to Vaccine Development. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2020; 17(11): 4375-4385. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00851

3.

3.         Tang XQ, Fang HR, Zhou CF, et al. A Novel Mechanism of Formaldehyde Neurotoxicity: Inhibition of Hydrogen Sulfide Generation by Promoting Overproduction of Nitric Oxide. Hetman M, ed. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(1): e54829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054829

4.

4.         Wang H xu, Li H cheng, Lv M qi, et al. Associations between occupation exposure to Formaldehyde and semen quality, a primary study. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5(1). doi: 10.1038/srep15874

5.

5.         International Agency for Research on Cancer. Agents classified by the IARC monographs. International Agency for Research on Cancer Group; 2012.

6.

6.         Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Announcement on the improving of national drug standards in 2019. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission; 2019.

7.

7.         Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 2020 Ed., Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission; 2020.

8.

8.         National Food and Drug Administration. Safety and Technical Standards for Cosmetics (2015 Edition). Beijing: People’s Standards Press of China; 2015. p. 413.

9.

9.         National Food and Drug Administration. Announcement on the inclusion of 9 inspection methods including the detection method of free formaldehyde in cosmetics into the Cosmetics Safety Technical Specification (2015 Edition). National Food and Drug Administration; 2015.

10.

10.      Xin JH, Qiu Y, Xue HQ, et al. Content determination of formaldehyde in bio-products using HPLC. J Microbiol. 2006; 26(5): 104.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yukun Chen, Congcong Liu, Weiyang Liang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).