![](/public/site/images/admin/AAS_Cover_with_ISSN1.png)
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Comparative study of pre⁃column derivatization liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization liquid chromatography for the determination of free formaldehyde residues in vaccines
Vol 3, Issue 1, 2022
VIEWS - 137 (Abstract)
Abstract
Objective: To establish a pre⁃column derivatization liquid chromatography method and a post⁃column derivatization liquid chromatography method for the determination of residual amount of free formaldehyde in vaccines. Consistency of the results of two methods was investigated. Methods: The pre⁃column derivatization liq⁃ uid chromatography was performed on a Shimadzu LC⁃20AT liquid chromatograph (SPD⁃20A UV detector). Sepa⁃ ration was accomplished on a Kromasil 100⁃5⁃C18(250mm×4.6mm) column with a mobile phase of 60% acetoni⁃ trile solution at a flow rate of 0. 8 mL·min-1 at 40℃ and the detection wavelength was 360 nm. The post⁃column derivatization liquid chromatography was performed on a Shimadzu LC⁃20AT liquid chromatograph (SPD⁃M20A diode array detector and vector derivative device). Separation was accomplished on a Chrom Core AQ⁃C18 (250mm ×4.6mm) column with a mobile phase of 0.2% (V/V) phosphoric acid solution at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min-1 at 25℃ and the detection wavelength was 412 nm. The derivatization solution was acetate buffer, the flow rate was 0. 5 mL·min-1, and the temperature was 100℃. The precision, repeatability and sample recovery of the two methods were investigated, and the experiment results were tested for significance by F⁃test and t⁃test. Results: The precolumn derivatization liquid chromatography had good linearity in the range of 0. 025 -100μg· mL-1(R =0. 999 9, n =12). RSD values of precision and repeatability were 0. 06 % and 0.3%-1.4%, respectively. The average recoveries were 97. 3%-104. 8 % with RSD of 0. 7%-2. 9 %. The limit of quantitation was 0. 02μg·mL-1, and the limit of detection was 0. 01μg·mL-1. The post⁃column derivatization liquid chromatog⁃ raphy had good linearity in the range of 0.025-100μg·mL-1 (R =0. 9999, n=12). RSD values of precision and repeatability were 0. 02% and 0. 0.7%-3.5 %, respectively. The average recoveries were 105. 6%-114. 6% with RSD of 0.3% - 1.9%. The limit of quantitation was 0. 02μg·mL-1, and the limit of detection was 0. 006μg·mL-1. The F⁃test and the t⁃test results showed there was no significant difference between two methods. Conclusion: Two methods are simple and accurate with high sensitivity and good specificity, which can be applicable to the determination of free formaldehyde residues in vaccines.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. LI JY, ZHANG JY, YANG XM. Progress in research on com⁃ monly used inactivators of biological products[J]. Chin J Biol, 2018, 31(9):1040
2. MICHIELS TJM, SCHÖNEICH C, HAMZINK MRJ, et al. Novel Formaldehyde–Induced Modifications of Lysine Residue Pairs in Peptides and Proteins: Identification and Relevance to Vaccine Development[J] . Mol Pharm, 2020, 17(11):4375
3. TANG XQ, FANG HR, ZHOU CF, et al. A novel mechanism of formaldehyde neurotoxicity: inhibition of hydrogen sulfide generation by promoting overproduction of nitric oxide[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1):e54829
4. WANG H, LI H, LV M, et al. Associations between occupation exposure to formaldehyde and semen quality, a primary study[J]. Sci Reports, 2015, 5:15874
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Agents classified by the IARC monographs, Volumes 1⁃105[R]. Group, 2012:1
6. https://www.chp.org.cn/gjyjw/tzgg/5046.
7. jhtml Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Announcement on the improving of national drug standards in 2019. (2019–06–18)[2022–03–14].
8. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China 2020 Edition. Three Volumes[S]. 2020:517 ChP 2020. Vol Ⅲ[S]. 2020:517
9. National Food and Drug Administration. Safety and Technical Standards for Cosmetics (2015 Edition)[S]. Beijing: People's Standards Press of China, 2015:413
10. National Food and Drug Administration. Announcement on the inclusion of 9 inspection methods including the detection method of free formaldehyde in cosmetics into the Cosmetics Safety Technical Specification (2015 Edition) (No. 12, 2019) [EB/ OL].(2019⁃03⁃22) [2022–01–09].
11. XIN JH, QIU Y, XUE HQ, et al. Content determination of formaldehyde in bio⁃products using HPLC[J]. J Microbiol, 2006, 26 (5):104
12. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China 2020 Edition. Four Volumes[S]. 2020:480 ChP 2020. Vol Ⅳ[S]. 2020: 480
13. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China 2020 Edition. Four Volumes[S]. 2020:39 ChP 2020. Vol Ⅳ[S]. 2020: 39
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Yukun Chen, Congcong Liu, Weiyang Liang
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
![](https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/public/site/images/admin/%E5%BE%AE%E4%BF%A1%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87_20240124162354.png)
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
![](/public/site/images/admin/sivan2(1)1.jpg)
Prof. Sivanesan Subramanian
Anna University, India
![](/public/site/images/admin/profileImage-18929.jpg)
Prof. Pascal Lorenz
University of Haute Alsace, France