The recognition of nature’s rights and the legal personhood of ecosystems is earning propulsion as an eco-centric legal framework, depicting an archetype shift in environmental law. This research explores the inception and advancement of this concept across different jurisdictions, centering Bangladesh, India, New Zealand, and Ecuador. They took essential footfalls to grant legal individuality to rivers, forests, and other ecosystems, aspiring to protect them from deterioration and ensure viability. Ecuador headed the validation of nature’s rights by preserving the concept in their 2008 Constitution, granting ecosystems the right to exist, replenish, and evolve. The Vilcabamba River case, which was a landmark, demonstrates the application of such rights in environmental conflicts. This research appraises the legal, cultural, and environmental connotation of these eco-centric accesses, comparing them across jurisdictions. It probes the persuasiveness of legal personhood in addressing ecological challenges and the disparity in implementation that frustrates its broader adoption. In addition, it tests how this legal modernization converges with Indigenous rights, sustainable development, and environmental justice, recommending pathways for the creation of a legal framework across-the-board that perceives the deep-seated value of nature. By analyzing the accomplishments and circumspection of these pioneering countries, this study contributes to the ongoing dialogue on establishing an internationally recognized eco-centric legal system for the protection of ecosystems.

1. Anaya, J., Indigenous Peoples in International Law (2nd edn, OUP 2004).

2. Annette Froehlich, Space Resource Utilization: A View from an Emerging Space-Faring Nation (Springer 2018)

3. Arias-Maldonado, F., Environmental Political Theory: Nature, Virtue, and Democracy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020)

4. Begum, S. M., “Environmental Justice in Bangladesh: Legal and Policy Frameworks” (2020) 12 Dhaka Law Journal 35

5. Berkes, F., Sacred Ecology (4th edn, Routledge 2017)

6. Bosselmann, K., The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance (2nd edn) (Routledge 2017) 56

7. Boyd, D. R., The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World (ECW Press 2017)

8. Boyd, D.R., The Rights of Nature: Recognizing the Right to a Healthy Environment (UBC Press 2019)

9. Brown, J., Legal Personhood for Nature: A Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2021)

10. Callicott, J. B., In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy (State University of New York Press 1989)

11. Christina Voigt, ‘Balancing Human and Ecological Interests in Environmental Law’ (2019) Env Policy Rev 301

12. Christina Voigt, ‘International Environmental Law and the Global Pact for the Environment’ (2019) 49 Env Pol Rev 101

13. Christopher D. Stone, ‘Should Trees Have Standing? —Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ (1972) 45(2) S Cal L Rev

14. Commonwealth of Australia, ‘State of the Environment 2016’ (2016), <https://soe.environment.gov.au>

15. Constitution of Ecuador, ‘The Rights of Nature’, (2008) Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Available at: <https://www.constituteproject.org> accessed 25 January 2025

16. Cullinan, C., Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice (2nd edn), (Green Books 2011)

17. Daniel Bodansky, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (Harvard University Press 2010) 96

18. Eduardo Gudynas, ‘Extractivism, Rights of Nature, and Environmental Conflicts in Latin America’ (2016) 43 Am Env Pol Rev 234

19. Eduardo Gudynas, ‘Rights of Nature in Latin America’ (2018) 34 Ecol Law Q 183

20. Erin O’Donnell and Julia Talbot-Jones, ‘Creating Legal Rights for Rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India’ (2018) 23 Ecology and Society 7

21. French, D., ‘The Global Recognition of the Rights of Nature: From Environmental Law to Ecological Law?’ (2019) 11(2) Journal of Environmental Law

22. Grear, A., 'Towards New Eco-Logical Paradigms in the Anthropocene' (2017) 28 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 63

23. Griggs, D. J. A., “The Whanganui River: A Case Study of Legal Personhood” (2017) 34 Environmental Law Journal 123-145

24. Gupta, S. K., “The Rights of Nature in Ecuador’s Constitution: An Overview” (2010) 58 Journal of International Environmental Law 24-48

25. Gupta, S. L., “The Evolution of Legal Personality in Environmental Law” (2017) 21 International Environmental Law Journal 50

26. Higgins, P., 'Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and Governance to Prevent the Destruction of Our Planet' (Shepheard-Walwyn 2010)

27. IPCC, ‘Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability’ (Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (H-O Pörtner et al eds, Cambridge University Press, 2022)

28. Jacqueline Peel, ‘Australia’s Path to Recognizing Nature’s Rights’ (2021) Sydney Env L Rev 41, 45

29. James R. May and Erin Daly, Global Environmental Constitutionalism (CUP 2015) 210

30. John Dewey, ‘The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality’ (1926) 35 Yale LJ 655, 660

31. John Gascoigne, The Enlightenment and the Origins of European Australia (Cambridge University Press 2002)

32. Jorge E. Viñuales, ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Environmental Law’ (2008) 32 Fordham Int'l LJ 232

33. Karen Scott, ‘International Law in the Anthropocene’ (2020) 31 Eur J Int Law 709

34. Kelsey Leonard, ‘Why Lakes and Rivers Should Have the Same Rights as Humans’ (TED, 2019), <https://www.ted.com> accessed 25 January 2025

35. Knox, J. H., 'The Human Right to a Healthy Environment' (2018) 16 Human Rights Law Review 19

36. Kothari, A., Rights of Nature: A Global Movement (Global Forest Coalition 2017)

37. Kotzé, L.J., Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene (Hart Publishing 2020)

38. Kotzé, L.J. and French, D., ‘The Anthropocentric Ontology of International Environmental Law and the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an Ecocentric Rule of Law’ (2018) 7(2) Global Journal of Comparative Law

39. Langton, M., 'Earth Jurisprudence and the Law' in Maloney M (ed), Wild Law: In Practice (Routledge 2011)

40. Leopold, A., A Sand County Almanac (Oxford University Press 1949)

41. Mayank Aggarwal, ‘India’s Supreme Court Stays Uttarakhand HC Ruling on Rivers’ (2017) Mongabay-India, <https://india.mongabay.com>

42. Miller, T., Eco-Centric Legal Systems: Global Case Studies (Oxford University Press 2022)

43. Moran, R. J. C., “Legal Personhood for the Ganga: The Indian Supreme Court's Landmark Decision” (2017) 33 Environmental Policy and Law 215-234

44. Naess, A., “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement”, (1973) 16(1-4) Inquiry 95-100

45. Naomi Klein, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate (Simon & Schuster 2014) 38

46. New Zealand Parliament, Innovative Bill Protects Whanganui River with Legal Personhood (2017), <https://www.parliament.nz> accessed 25 January 2025

47. O’Donnell, E., ‘At the Intersection of the Sacred and Legal: Rights of Nature in Plurinational States’ (2020) 31(2) Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 233

48. Pacheco, L. T., “Bolivia's Mother Earth Law: Rights and Responsibilities” (2011) 22 Latin American Law Review 87-105

49. Philippe Sands, Principles of International Environmental Law (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2012) 300

50. Philippe Sands, Principles of International Environmental Law (3rd edn, CUP 2012) 147

51. Rahman, M. H., “Environmental Rights: A New Era in Bangladesh?” (2019) 23 Bangladesh Law Review 45

52. Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants (Milkweed Editions 2013) 56

53. Rüdiger Wolfrum, ‘The Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (1983) 43 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 312

54. Ruru, J., ‘Listening to Papatūānuku: A Call for a Legal Personhood Model’ (2019) 6(2) Victoria University of Wellington Law Review

55. Salmond, A., 'Whanganui River as a Legal Person' (2014) 20 Anthropology Today 5

56. Savaresi, A., 'The Rise of Community Energy from Grassroots to Mainstream: Where to Next?' (2021) 8(1) Transnational Environmental Law 1

57. Senthil Kumar, K., ‘The Rights of Nature: Comparative Analysis in Ecuador and Bolivia’ (2018) Env Law Rev 150

58. Shelton, D., Remedies in International Human Rights Law (3rd edn) (OUP 2015) 203

59. Smith, L., 'The Legal Personhood of the Whanganui River: A Turning Point for Environmental Rights' (2020) 37 New Zealand Environmental Journal 12

60. Stone, C. D., “Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects”, (1972) 45(4) Southern California Law Review 450-501

61. Straumann, B., ‘Ancient Caesarian Lawyers’ in a State of Nature: Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’ De Iure Praedae’ (2006) 34 Political Theory 330, 332

62. Fitzmaurice, A., ‘A Genealogy of Terra Nullius’ (2007) Australian Historical Studies 129, 6

63. Stybel, M., ‘Challenges in Implementing the Rights of Nature in Bolivia: Law vs. Economic Interests’ (2019) 4(1) Environmental Law Review

64. Taylor, P., Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (Princeton University Press 1986)

65. The Earth Charter Initiative, The Earth Charter (2000), <https://earthcharter.org> accessed 25 January 2025

66. UN General Assembly, Human Rights and the Environment (2018) A/RES/73/284

67. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Environmental Rule of Law: First Global Report (UNEP 2019)

68. Verschuuren, R., ‘Greening the Legal Frameworks in Ecuador and Bolivia’ (2012) 16 QIL 1