
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Determinants of corporate social responsibility in Tunisian context
Vol 2, Issue 2, 2025
Download PDF
Abstract
This paper examines the various determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and assesses the impact of each on CSR practices. Drawing on a solid theoretical framework, we consider factors such as firm characteristics and governance mechanisms. In addition to the CSR determinants, we also explain the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aims to enrich the CSR literature and provide concrete perspectives for professionals wishing to strengthen their commitment to CSR.
Keywords
References
1. Carroll AB. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review. 1979; 4(4): 497. doi: 10.2307/257850
2. Carroll A. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991; 34: 39-48.
3. Zu L, Song L. Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008; 88(S1): 105-117. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9828-7
4. Heyder M, Theuvsen L. Determinants and Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility in German Agribusiness: A PLS Model. Agribusiness. 2012; 28(4): 400-420. doi: 10.1002/agr.21305
5. Withisuphakorn P, Jiraporn P. The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR? Applied Economics Letters. 2015; 23(4): 298-301. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1071464
6. Pradhan AK, Nibedita B. The Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indian Firms. Global Business Review. 2019; 22(3): 753-766. doi: 10.1177/0972150918814318
7. Oh WY, Chang YK, Jung R.. Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: does family involvement in management matter?. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 103: 23-33.
8. Endrikat J, de Villiers C, Guenther TW, et al. Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Business & Society. 2020; 60(8): 2099-2135. doi: 10.1177/0007650320930638
9. Gokarna P, Krishnamoorthy B. Corporate social responsibility in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study of developing country corporates. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review. 2021; 5(3): 73-80. doi: 10.22495/cgsrv5i3p6
10. Schwartz MS, Kay A. The COVID-19 global crisis and corporate social responsibility. Asian Journal of Business Ethics. 2023; 12(1): 101-124. doi: 10.1007/s13520-022-00165-y
11. Healy PM, Palepu KG. The fall of Enron. Journal of economic perspectives. 2003; 17(2): 3-26.
12. Lyke B, Jickling M. WorldCom: The accounting scandal. In Congressional Research Service Report for Congress. 2002; (29): 1-6.
13. Rahman F, Norman RT. The effect of firm scale and CSR geographical scope of impact on consumers’ response. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2016; 28: 189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.10.006
14. Hur W, Kim Y. How Does Culture Improve Consumer Engagement in CSR Initiatives? the Mediating Role of Motivational Attributions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2017; 24(6): 620-633. doi: 10.1002/csr.1432
15. Jones TM. Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. The Academy of Management Review. 1995; 20(2): 404. doi: 10.2307/258852
16. Jones TM, Wicks AC. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review. 1999; 24(2): 206. doi: 10.2307/259075
17. Post JE, Preston LE, Sachs S. Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review. 2002; 45(1): 6-28. doi: 10.2307/41166151
18. Freeman RE. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman; 1984.
19. Ayuso S, Rodríguez MA, García-Castro R, et al. Maximizing Stakeholders’ Interests. Business & Society. 2012; 53(3): 414-439. doi: 10.1177/0007650311433122
20. Clarkson MBE. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review. 1995; 20(1): 92. doi: 10.2307/258888
21. Youn H, Hua N, Lee S. Does size matter? Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2015; 51: 127-134.
22. D’Amato A, Falivena C. Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019; 27(2): 909-924. doi: 10.1002/csr.1855
23. Wasiuzzaman S, Uyar A, Kuzey C, et al. Corporate social responsibility: Is it a matter of slack financial resources or strategy or both? Managerial and Decision Economics. 2021; 43(6): 2444-2466. doi: 10.1002/mde.3537
24. Fahad P, Nidheesh KB. Determinants of CSR disclosure: an evidence from India. Journal of Indian Business Research. 2020; 13(1): 110-133. doi: 10.1108/jibr-06-2018-0171
25. Jarboui A, Dammak Ben Hlima N, Bouaziz D. Do sustainability committee characteristics affect CSR performance? Evidence from India. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2022; 30(2): 628-652. doi: 10.1108/bij-04-2021-0225
26. Agarwala N, Pareek R, Sahu TN. Does board independence influence CSR performance? A GMM-based dynamic panel data approach. Social Responsibility Journal. 2022; 19(6): 1003-1022.
27. Godos-Díez, J. L., Cabeza-Garcia, L., Alonso-Martínez, D., & Fernández-Gago, R. (2018). Factors influencing board of directors’ decision-making process as determinants of CSR engagement. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 229-253.
28. Wellalage N, Locke S, Acharya S. Does the composition of boards of directors impact on CSR scores?. Social Responsibility Journal. 2018; 14(3): 651-669.
29. Naser K, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Kwari D, et al. Determinants of Corporate Social Disclosure in Developing Countries: The Case of Qatar. Advances in International Accounting. 2006; 19: 1-23.
30. Flanagan DJ, O’Shaughnessy KC. The effect of layoffs on firm reputation. Journal of management. 2005; 31(3): 445-463.
31. Chi W, Wu SJ, Zheng Z. Determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from private firms. The British Accounting Review. 2020; 52(6): 100939.
32. Dhaliwal DS, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A, et al. Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. The Accounting Review. 2012; 87(3): 723-759. doi: 10.2308/accr-10218
33. Soufeljil M, Lakhal L, Belloumi M. Impacts of the characteristics of Tunisian family SMEs on the adoption of CSR: mediating role of CSR knowledge (French). Recherches en Sciences de Gestion. 2016; 115(4): 99-123. doi: 10.3917/resg.115.0099
34. Attig N, Boubakri N, El Ghoul S, et al. Firm Internationalization and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014; 134(2): 171-197. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2410-6
35. Lau C, Lu Y, Liang Q. Corporate social responsibility in China: A corporate governance approach. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016; 136: 73-87.
36. Pant A, Ramachandran J. Navigating identity duality in multinational subsidiaries: A paradox lens on identity claims at Hindustan Unilever 1959–2015. Journal of International Business Studies. 2017; 48(6): 664-692. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0076-x
37. Zhong M, Zhao W, Shahab Y. The philanthropic response of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility strategies to COVID‐19 crisis: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021; 29(2): 339-355. doi: 10.1002/csr.2204
38. Khemir S, Baccouche C. Analysis of the determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure in the annual reports of Tunisian listed firms. In: Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2010. pp. 119-144.
39. Moneva JM, Bonilla-Priego MJ, Ortas E. Corporate social responsibility and organisational performance in the tourism sector. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2019; 28(6): 853-872. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1707838
40. Kim HD, Kim T, Kim Y, Park K. Do long-term institutional investors promote corporate social responsibility activities?. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2019; 101: 256-269.
41. Nguyen PA, Kecskés A, Mansi S. Does corporate social responsibility create shareholder value? The importance of long-term investors. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2020; 112: 105217.
42. Meier O, Naccache P, Schier G. Exploring the Curvature of the Relationship Between HRM–CSR and Corporate Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2019; 170(4): 857-873. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04332-3
43. Oware KM, Mallikarjunappa T. CSR expenditure, mandatory CSR reporting and financial performance of listed firms in India: an institutional theory perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research. 2020; 30(1): 1-21. doi: 10.1108/medar-05-2020-0896
44. Waddock SA, Graves SB. The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic management journa. 1997; 18(4): 303-319.
45. Genedy A, Sakr A. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in developing countries. Case of Egypt. International Journal of Business and Economic Development (IJBED). 2017; 5(2).
46. McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification. Strategic Management Journal. 2000; 21: 603-660.
47. Padgett RC, Galan JI. The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009; 93(3): 407-418. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0230-x
48. Ozer M, Zhang W. The effects of geographic and network ties on exploitative and exploratory product innovation. Strategic Management Journal. 2014; 36(7): 1105-1114. doi: 10.1002/smj.2263
49. Fu L, Boehe D, Orlitzky M. Are R&D-Intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study. Research Policy. 2020; 49(8): 104082.
50. Jamali D, Safieddine AM, Rabbath M. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2008; 16(5): 443-459. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x
51. Cabeza‐García L, Fernández‐Gago R, Nieto M. Do Board Gender Diversity and Director Typology Impact CSR Reporting? European Management Review. 2017; 15(4): 559-575. doi: 10.1111/emre.12143
52. Chen W, Zhou G, Zhu X. CEO tenure and corporate social responsibility performance. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 95: 292-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.018
53. Harjoto MA, Rossi F. Religiosity, female directors, and corporate social responsibility for Italian listed companies. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 95: 338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.013
54. Katmon N, Mohamad ZZ, Norwani NM, et al. Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017; 157(2): 447-481. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3672-6
55. Helfaya A, Moussa T. Do Board’s Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017; 26(8): 1061-1077. doi: 10.1002/bse.1960
56. Dunbar CG, Li ZF, Shi Y. Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility and Firm Risk: The Role of Corporate Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3791594
57. Elmagrhi MH, Ntim CG, Elamer AA, et al. A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018; 28(1): 206-220. doi: 10.1002/bse.2250
58. El Mehdi IK. Governance and CSR: Untangling the Tangle (French). Recherches en Sciences de Gestion. 2014; 97(4): 163-186. doi: 10.3917/resg.097.0163
59. He H, Harris L. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research. 2020; 116: 176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
60. Ashraf S, Arain GA, Yousaf Z, Aslam U. Corporate social responsibility and COVID-19: A Crucial Examination into HRM Strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2021; 1-10
61. Baatwah SR, Al-Qadasi A, Al-Shehri A, et al. Corporate Social Responsibility Budgeting and Spending during COVID–19 in Oman: A Humanitarian Response to the Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3997885
62. Zhang G, Wang L, Guo F, et al. Does corporate internationalization affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review. 2021; 46: 100794. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100794
63. Bose S, Shams S, Ali MJ, et al. COVID‐19 impact, sustainability performance and firm value: international evidence. Accounting & Finance. 2021; 62(1): 597-643. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12801
64. Bhatia A, Dhawan A. A paradigm shift in corporate social responsibility: India’s transition from mandatory regime to the COVID-19 era. Social Responsibility Journal. 2021; 19(1): 166-183. doi: 10.1108/srj-01-2021-0020
65. Hasan I, Singh S, Kashiramka S. CSR initiatives and stakeholder engagement amidst COVID-19 pandemic: insights using content analysis and literature review. Social Responsibility Journal. 2023; 20(3): 503-537. doi: 10.1108/srj-09-2022-0376
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau