
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.

Revisiting the pollution-haven vs. porter hypotheses: Empirical evidence from Nigeria
Vol 3, Issue 2, 2025
Download PDF
Abstract
Since the 1970s, the role of trade liberalization and foreign direct investment in promoting environmental sustainability has been a hot topic in academics. While some research supports the Porter hypothesis, others support the pollution-haven hypothesis. Accordingly, this study aims to determine whether the pollution haven hypothesis holds by examining how trade openness and foreign direct investment affect Nigeria’s environmental sustainability for the period of 1981 to 2021. By deploying the dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) estimation technique, the study outcomes indicate that trade openness and foreign direct investment have a negative and significant long-term effect on Nigeria’s greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, the results of this study support the Potter hypothesis, which holds that emerging nations become centers of advanced and cleaner technology as a result of trade liberalization and foreign direct investment. As a result, the study suggests that the Nigerian government should support the creation of compressed natural gas (CNG) stations and the switch to CNG-powered vehicles. The Nigerian government can also promote investment in the green energy industry by offering tax holidays and other benefits to companies in this field. Furthermore, there should be a widespread public education campaign on the threat posed by global warming and the necessity of planting trees to mitigate the effects of climate change and discourage tree-cutting.
Keywords
References
1. Okoi IE, Obioesio F, Okpan A, Edet IO. Trade Openness and Co2 Emission: Evidence from Nigeria. Global Journal of Social Sciences. 2025; 24(1): 27–41.
2. Gill FL, Viswanathan KK, Karim MZA. The critical review of the pollution haven hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2018; 8(1): 167–174.
3. Bilawal M, Ibrahim M, Abbas A, et al. Impact of exchange rate on foreign direct investment in Pakistan. Advances in Economics and Business. 2014; 2(6): 223–231. doi: 10.13189/aeb.2014.020602
4. Ghazalian PL, Amponsem F. The effects of economic freedom on FDI inflows: An empirical analysis. Applied Economics. 2019; 51(11): 1111–1132. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2018.1524979
5. Copeland BR, Taylor MS. North-South Trade and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1994; 109(3): 755–787. doi: 10.4324/9781315201986-17
6. Riti JS, Sentanu IGEPS, Cai A, Sheikh S. Foreign direct investment, manufacturing export and the environment in Nigeria: A test of pollution haven hypothesis. NIDA Development Journal. 2016; 56(2): 73–98.
7. Ayadi FS, Mlanga S, Ikpor MI, Nnachi RA. Empirical test of Pollution Haven Hypothesis in Nigeria using autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2019; 10(3): 48.
8. Ekesiobi C, Emmanuel PM, Mgbemena E, et al. Modelling International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Carbon Emission Nexus in Nigeria: A Reconsideration of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Available online: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2140267/v1 (accessed on 19 November 2023)
9. Singhania M, Saini N. Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI. Journal of Business Research. 2021; 123: 516–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007
10. Yan H, Yao X, Li Y, Xiong Z. Capital market liberalization and corporate ESG rating divergence: a quasi-natural experiment based on the trading system of SSHC. Applied Economics. 2025. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2449849
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. National Policy on the Environment (Revised 2016). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEX-FAOC176320/ (accessed on 19 November 2023).
12. Climate action tracker. Policies and action against fair share 1.5 °C COMPATIBLE. Available online: https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/nigeria/policies-action/ (accessed on 19 November 2023)
13. Khan NH, Nafees M, ur Rahman A, Saeed T. Ecodesigning for ecological sustainability. In: Frontiers in plant-soil interaction. Academic Press; 2021. pp. 589–616. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90943-3.00019-5
14. Ghosh P, Westhoff P, Debnath D. Biofuels, food security, and sustainability. In: Biofuels, bioenergy and food security. Academic Press; 2019. pp. 211–229. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803954-0.00012-7
15. United Nations. Trade openness. Available online: https://archive.unescwa.org/trade-openness (accessed on 20 November 2023)
16. Mahmood H, Maalel N, Zarrad O. Trade openness and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Tunisia. Sustainability. 2019; 11(12): 3295. doi: 10.3390/su11123295
17. Gibbs D. Ecological modernization. In: International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology. Wiley; 2016. pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0434
18. Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I. Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: An empirical investigation. Energy. 2017; 124: 706–719. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089
19. Zubair AO, Samad ARA, Dankumo AM. Does gross domestic income, trade integration, FDI inflows, GDP, and capital reduces CO2 emissions? Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2020; 2: 100009. doi: 10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100009
20. Usman AS, Manap TAA. The effect of foreign direct investment and multinational corporations on sustainable development in Nigeria: halo or haven? Emphasis on CO2 anthropogenic emission. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; 2010; Volume 59.
21. Yakubu IN, Musah A. FDI and Environmental Sustainability Nexus: Testing the Pollution Haven Hypothesis in the Presence of Regulatory Quality. International Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Finance. 2022; 4(3): 287–295.
22. Shen D, Guo X, Ma S. Study on the Coupled and Coordinated Development of Climate Investment and Financing and Green Finance of China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(24): 11008. doi: 10.3390/su16241108
23. Orji A, Nwagu GU, Ogbuabor JE, et al. Foreign Direct Investment and Growth Nexus: Further Evidence from Africa’s Largest Economy. Journal of Infrastructure Development. 2021; 13(1): 65–78.
24. Nwagu GU, Orji A, Duru EE, et al. Economic Growth and FDI Nexus In Nigeria: A New Evidence. Journal of Liaoning Technical University. Natural Science Edition. 2023; 17(11): 215–235
25. Ogbuabor JE, Orji A, Eigbiremolen GO, et al. The Role of Institutions in the FDI-Growth Relationship in a Developing Economy: A New Evidence from Nigeria. Studia commercialia Bratislavensia. 2020; 13(4): 348–363.
26. Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Nwosu EO, et al. FDI, Remittance Inflows, and Economic Development in a Developing Economy: What Do Nigerian Data Show? Journal of Academic Research in Economics. 2019; 11(1): 27–45.
27. Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Anthony-Orji OI, Monye EG. Anaysis of Interest Rate Spread, Financial Development and Foreign Capital Inflow Nexus in Nigeria. The Journal of Developing Areas. 2023; 57(3): 49–64.
28. Anthony-Orji OI, Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Nwosu EO. Disaggregated Foreign Capital Inflows and Economic Growth in a Developing Economy: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Studies. 2018a; 5(1): 1–11.
29. Anthony-Orji OI, Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Nwosu EO. Foreign Capital Inflows and Unemployment in Nigeria: A New Evidence from ARDL-Bounds Testing Approach. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management. 2018b; 5(6): 176–188.
30. Gharnit S, Bouzahzah M, Soussane JA. Foreign direct investment and pollution havens: evidence from African countries. Archives of Business Research. 2019; 7(12): 244–252. doi: 10.14738/abr.712.7531
31. Halliru AM, Loganathan N, Sethi N, Hassan AAG. FDI inflows, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth for ECOWAS countries: the pollution haven hypothesis approach. International Journal of Green Economics. 2020; 14(4): 327–348. doi: 10.1504/IJGE.2020.112576
32. Nathaniel S, Aguegboh E, Iheonu C, et al. Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 27: 35474–35487. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09521-6
33. Bouzahzah M. Pollution haven hypothesis in Africa: does the quality of institutions matter? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. 2022; 12(1): doi: 10.32479/ijeep.11856
34. Tiba S, Belaid F. The pollution concerns in the era of globalization: Do the contribution of foreign direct investment and trade openness matter? Energy Economics. 2020; 92: 104966. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104966
35. Abbas HSM, Xu X, and Sun C. Role of foreign direct investment interaction to energy consumption and institutional governance in sustainable GHG emission reduction. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021; 28(40): 56808–56821. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14650-7
36. Orji A, Aza GC, Anthony-Orji OI, Isaac N. Foreign Direct Investment-Firm Productivity Nexus in West Africa: New Empirical Insights from Firm Level Data. Journal of Public Affairs. 2022a; 22(4): 1–9
37. Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Okolomike FC, Anthony-Orji O. Do Capital Inflows and Financial Development, Influence Economic Growth in West Africa? Further Evidence from Transmission Mechanisms. Econometric Research in Finance. 2022b; 7(1): 71–94.
38. Orji A, Ogbuabor JE, Okolomike FC, Anthony-Orji O. Capital Inflows, Financial Development and Growth in ECOWAS Countries: A New Empirical Insight. Applied Econometrics and International Development. 2022c; 22(1): 61–80.
39. Orji A, Uche SA, Ilori AE. Foreign Capital Inflows and Growth: An Empirical Analysis of WAMZ Experience. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2014; 4(4): 971–983.
40. Wooldrige JM. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach, 5th ed. Cengage Learning; 2013.
41. Kojo R, Paschal N. Urban population growth and environmental sustainability in Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Studies. 2018; 5(1): 12–19. doi: 10.18488/journal.66.2018.51.12.19
42. Schneider N. Population growth, electricity demand, and environmental sustainability in Nigeria: Insights from a vector auto-regressive approach. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2022; 79(1): 149–176, doi: 10.1080/00207233.2021.1905317
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Prof. Kittisak Jermsittiparsert
University of City Island, Cyprus




Date and Time: June 15, 2025 19:00-20:30 (GMT+8), June 15, 2025 14:00-15:30 (GMT+3).